CVE-2025-30985: Critical Deserialization Vulnerability in NotFound GNUCommerce

Overview

The scope of this blog post revolves around a critical vulnerability found in NotFound GNUCommerce, denoted by the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) identifier CVE-2025-30985. This is a Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability, which could potentially lead to severe system compromise or data leakage. As GNUCommerce is a widely used eCommerce platform, the CVE-2025-30985 vulnerability could affect a significant number of online businesses, making it a pressing issue in the cybersecurity community.
The severity of this vulnerability is underscored by its high CVSS Severity Score of 9.8, putting it near the top of the scale in terms of potential damage. Understanding this vulnerability, its effects, and how to mitigate it, is crucial for any entity utilizing GNUCommerce from version n/a through 1.5.4.

Vulnerability Summary

CVE ID: CVE-2025-30985
Severity: Critical (9.8 CVSS Score)
Attack Vector: Network
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Impact: System compromise, potential data leakage

Affected Products

Product | Affected Versions

NotFound GNUCommerce | n/a through 1.5.4

How the Exploit Works

The exploit takes advantage of a flaw in the deserialization process of data in NotFound GNUCommerce. In a nutshell, deserialization is the process of converting a stream of bytes back into a copy of the original object. The problem arises when an attacker can manipulate the serialized object to include malicious code. When the system deserializes the untrusted data, it inadvertently executes the malicious code, which could lead to a complete system compromise or data leakage.

Conceptual Example Code

Here is a conceptual example of how the vulnerability might be exploited. This example uses a malicious JSON payload in a POST request:

POST /vulnerable/endpoint HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example.com
Content-Type: application/json
{
"object": {
"_type": "someClass",
"_value": {
"command": "rm -rf /"  // an example of a malicious command
}
}
}

In this example, the attacker sends a serialized object containing a malicious command via a POST request. If the system deserializes this untrusted data, it could execute the malicious command.
Strong> Mitigation Guidance
The best way to mitigate this vulnerability is to apply the vendor’s patch once it is available. In the meantime, using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) can serve as a temporary mitigation measure. These systems can detect and block known malicious payloads, providing a layer of security until the patch can be applied.
Remember, the most effective cybersecurity strategies involve proactive measures. Stay informed about the latest vulnerabilities and ensure your systems are regularly updated to the latest security standards.