Author: Ameeba

  • CVE-2025-27456: SMB Server Vulnerability to Brute-Force Attacks

    Overview

    CVE-2025-27456 represents a significant vulnerability in the SMB server’s login mechanism. This vulnerability, impacting a broad range of systems using the SMB protocol, allows potential attackers to execute brute-force attacks due to insufficient prevention measures against multiple failed authentication attempts. As a result, this vulnerability could lead to severe consequences, such as system compromise or data leakage.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-27456
    Severity: High, CVSS score 7.5
    Attack Vector: Network
    Privileges Required: None
    User Interaction: None
    Impact: Potential system compromise or data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    Microsoft Windows Server | All versions prior to patch
    Linux Samba Server | Versions 4.0.0 to 4.10.16

    How the Exploit Works

    An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by continuously attempting to authenticate with the SMB server using different credentials within a short timeframe. Given the lack of measures preventing multiple failed attempts, the server remains susceptible to these brute-force attacks. If successful, the attacker could potentially gain unauthorized access, leading to system compromise or data leakage.

    Conceptual Example Code

    The following is a conceptual example of how an attacker might attempt to brute-force the server:

    import socket
    import itertools
    import string
    def try_login(ip, user, password):
    s = socket.socket()
    s.connect((ip, 445))
    # Send SMB authentication request with the user and password
    s.send(f'AUTH {user} {password}\n')
    response = s.recv(1024)
    s.close()
    return 'Success' in response
    def brute_force(ip, user):
    for password_length in range(1, 9):  # Try passwords of length 1 to 8
    for password in itertools.product(string.printable, repeat=password_length):
    password = ''.join(password)
    if try_login(ip, user, password):
    print(f'Found password: {password}')
    return
    brute_force('192.0.2.0', 'admin')

    In this mock example, the attacker is attempting to brute-force the ‘admin’ account on the server at IP address ‘192.0.2.0’. The attacker tries all printable ASCII characters in passwords of length 1 to 8. If a password is found, it’s printed and the attack stops.

  • CVE-2025-27449: A Critical Brute-Force Attack Vulnerability in MEAC300-FNADE4 Systems

    Overview

    The vulnerability, identified as CVE-2025-27449, is a severe security flaw found in the MEAC300-FNADE4 systems. This vulnerability allows potential attackers to execute brute-force attacks due to the system’s insufficiency in preventing multiple failed authentication attempts within a short time frame. The implications of this vulnerability are significant, potentially compromising systems or leading to data leakage.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-27449
    Severity: High (7.5 CVSS Score)
    Attack Vector: Network
    Privileges Required: None
    User Interaction: None
    Impact: System compromise and potential data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    MEAC300-FNADE4 | All versions prior to patch

    How the Exploit Works

    The vulnerability stems from the system’s lack of effective measures to prevent multiple failed login attempts within a short timeframe. Attackers can exploit this weakness by repeatedly attempting to authenticate with different credentials until successful. This form of attack, known as brute force, can potentially allow an attacker to gain unauthorized access to the system.

    Conceptual Example Code

    The following is a conceptual example of a brute-force attack exploiting this vulnerability:

    import requests
    target_url = "http://target.example.com/login"
    username = "admin"
    # Brute force password
    for password in password_list:
    payload = {"username": username, "password": password}
    response = requests.post(target_url, data=payload)
    if response.status_code == 200:
    print(f"Successful login with password: {password}")
    break

    In the above pseudocode, we attempt to authenticate with a list of passwords until a successful login response is received. This is a simplified example and real-world brute-force attacks may be more complex and sophisticated.

    Mitigation Guidance

    It is highly encouraged for users of MEAC300-FNADE4 to apply the vendor patch as soon as possible to mitigate this vulnerability. If the patch cannot be applied immediately, a temporary solution would be the use of a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) to monitor and block suspicious authentication attempts.

  • CVE-2025-1710: Brute-Force Vulnerability in maxView Storage Manager

    Overview

    The reported vulnerability CVE-2025-1710, found within the maxView Storage Manager, exposes potential risks to system integrity and data security. The vulnerability stems from the software’s inability to effectively thwart multiple failed authentication attempts within a short time period, rendering it susceptible to brute-force attacks. Affected systems could face grave consequences, including system compromise and data leakage.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-1710
    Severity: High (7.5 CVSS Score)
    Attack Vector: Network
    Privileges Required: None
    User Interaction: Not Required
    Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to system compromise and data leakage.

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    maxView Storage Manager | All versions prior to the patched release

    How the Exploit Works

    The exploit works by repeatedly attempting to authenticate with the maxView Storage Manager using different credentials in a short span of time. Due to the lack of measures in place to prevent or slow down multiple failed authentication attempts, an attacker could potentially gain unauthorized access by guessing the correct credentials through a brute-force attack.

    Conceptual Example Code

    A conceptual example of how this vulnerability might be exploited is through repeated HTTP POST requests to the login endpoint with different credentials. An example of this could be:

    POST /login HTTP/1.1
    Host: target.example.com
    Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
    username=guess&password=guess

    The “username” and “password” fields would be substituted with different values on each request in a brute force attempt to guess the correct credentials.

    Recommended Mitigation

    To mitigate this vulnerability, it is recommended to apply the vendor’s patch as soon as it becomes available. In the meantime, implementing a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) may serve as a temporary mitigation strategy.

  • CVE-2025-27022: Path Traversal Vulnerability in Infinera G42 WebGUI HTTP Endpoint

    Overview

    The vulnerability, identified as CVE-2025-27022, is a significant path traversal vulnerability that affects the WebGUI HTTP endpoint in Infinera G42 version R6.1.3. This vulnerability is significant as it allows remote authenticated users to potentially download all OS files via HTTP requests, highlighting a potential risk of system compromise and data leakage.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-27022
    Severity: High (7.5 CVSS)
    Attack Vector: Network
    Privileges Required: User level
    User Interaction: Required
    Impact: System compromise, data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    Infinera G42 | R6.1.3

    How the Exploit Works

    The exploit leverages a path traversal vulnerability in the WebGUI HTTP endpoint. This vulnerability stems from a lack of sufficient validation of user-supplied input. The flaw allows authenticated users to access all files on the target machine file system that are readable to the user account used to run the httpd service. This means that a malicious authenticated user could potentially download all readable files on the system via HTTP requests.

    Conceptual Example Code

    The vulnerability might be exploited using a crafted HTTP request like the one below:

    GET /../../../etc/passwd HTTP/1.1
    Host: target.example.com
    Authorization: Basic [Base64-encoded-credentials]

    In this example, the “GET” request attempts to traverse the file system to reach the “/etc/passwd” file, a common target for attacks due to its sensitive content. The “Authorization” header includes Base64-encoded credentials for an authenticated user.

  • CVE-2025-6464: PHP Object Injection Vulnerability in Forminator Forms WordPress Plugin

    Overview

    The Forminator Forms plugin for WordPress, a popular tool for creating various types of forms, is found to possess a critical vulnerability that could potentially lead to a system compromise or data leakage. The vulnerability, identified as CVE-2025-6464, affects all versions up to and including 1.44.2. This report lays out the details of this vulnerability, its potential impact, and the steps required for mitigation.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-6464
    Severity: High (7.5)
    Attack Vector: Network
    Privileges Required: None
    User Interaction: None
    Impact: System compromise and potential data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    Forminator Forms Plugin for WordPress | Up to and including 1.44.2

    How the Exploit Works

    The vulnerability exists due to the unsafe deserialization of untrusted input in the ‘entry_delete_upload_files’ function. An attacker can exploit this by injecting a malicious PHP Object through a PHAR file. The deserialization occurs when a form submission is deleted, either by an Administrator or via auto-deletion determined by plugin settings. If a PHP Object-Oriented Programming (POP) chain is present in an additional plugin or theme installed on the target system, arbitrary actions such as file deletion, sensitive data retrieval, or code execution could be performed depending on the POP chain present.

    Conceptual Example Code

    The following is a conceptual example of how the vulnerability might be exploited. This is a sample HTTP request with a malicious payload.

    POST /forminator_forms/delete HTTP/1.1
    Host: target.example.com
    Content-Type: application/php
    { "entry_delete_upload_files": "phar://path/to/malicious/file.phar" }

    Mitigation

    Users are advised to apply the vendor patch immediately. For temporary mitigation, users can employ a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) to monitor and block suspicious activities. However, these measures only offer temporary relief and do not address the root cause of the vulnerability.

  • CVE-2025-6437: High Severity SQL Injection Vulnerability in Ads Pro Plugin – Multi-Purpose WordPress Advertising Manager

    Overview

    The Ads Pro Plugin – Multi-Purpose WordPress Advertising Manager plugin for WordPress has been found to be vulnerable to SQL Injection attacks. This vulnerability allows unauthenticated attackers to manipulate SQL queries, potentially leading to system compromise or data leakage. It affects all versions of the plugin up to and including 4.89, making it a significant cause for concern for WordPress users globally.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-6437
    Severity: High (7.5 CVSS Score)
    Attack Vector: Network
    Privileges Required: None
    User Interaction: None
    Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized access, system compromise, and data leakage.

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    Ads Pro Plugin – Multi-Purpose WordPress Advertising Manager | Up to and including 4.89

    How the Exploit Works

    The vulnerability arises from the insufficient escaping of the ‘oid’ parameter and the lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. An unauthenticated attacker can append additional SQL queries into the existing ones via this parameter. This could allow them to manipulate database transactions or extract sensitive information from the database.

    Conceptual Example Code

    Here’s a conceptual example of how the vulnerability might be exploited:

    GET /index.php?oid=1' OR '1'='1'; SELECT * FROM wp_users; -- HTTP/1.1
    Host: vulnerable-website.com

    In this example, the attacker appends additional SQL queries to the ‘oid’ parameter, causing the database to return all the users’ data.

    Mitigation

    Users are strongly recommended to apply the vendor patch once it is available. As a temporary mitigation, users can implement a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS). These can help prevent attacks by detecting and blocking malicious SQL queries.

  • CVE-2025-5339: Time-Based SQL Injection Vulnerability in WordPress Ads Pro Plugin

    Overview

    The popular WordPress Ads Pro Plugin, used for ad management, has been found to contain a time-based SQL injection vulnerability. This vulnerability, identified as CVE-2025-5339, affects all versions up to and including 4.89. Unauthenticated attackers can exploit this vulnerability to potentially gain unauthorized access to sensitive data on the database, leading to system compromise or data leakage.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-5339
    Severity: High (7.5 CVSS)
    Attack Vector: Web-based
    Privileges Required: None
    User Interaction: None
    Impact: Unauthorized access to sensitive data, potential system compromise

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    Ads Pro Plugin – Multi-Purpose WordPress Advertising Manager | Up to and including 4.89

    How the Exploit Works

    The vulnerability exists due to insufficient escaping of the ‘bsa_pro_id’ parameter and lack of adequate preparation on the existing SQL query. An unauthenticated attacker can append additional SQL queries into existing queries. By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker can manipulate SQL queries to extract sensitive information from the database.

    Conceptual Example Code

    The following is a conceptual example of how the vulnerability might be exploited. This is a sample HTTP GET request, where an attacker appends a malicious SQL query to the ‘bsa_pro_id’ parameter.

    GET /wp-content/plugins/ads-pro/?bsa_pro_id=1' OR '1'='1'; -- HTTP/1.1
    Host: target.example.com

    The above request triggers the SQL injection vulnerability, potentially returning sensitive information from the database.

    Mitigation Guidance

    It is recommended to apply the vendor patch as soon as it is available. Until then, using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) could serve as temporary mitigation. Ensure that these security systems are configured correctly to detect and prevent SQL injection attacks.

  • CVE-2025-4381: SQL Injection Vulnerability in Ads Pro Plugin – Multi-Purpose WordPress Advertising Manager

    Overview

    CVE-2025-4381 is a significant cybersecurity threat to WordPress users using the Ads Pro Plugin – Multi-Purpose WordPress Advertising Manager. It is an SQL Injection vulnerability that can lead to severe consequences such as system compromise or data leakage. This report details the vulnerability, its impact, and recommended mitigation strategies.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-4381
    Severity: High (7.5 CVSS Score)
    Attack Vector: Network
    Privileges Required: None
    User Interaction: None
    Impact: System compromise or data leakage due to SQL Injection

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    Ads Pro Plugin – Multi-Purpose WordPress Advertising Manager | Up to and including 4.89

    How the Exploit Works

    The exploit occurs due to insufficient escaping on a user-supplied parameter and a lack of adequate preparation on an existing SQL query within the getSpace() function of the plugin. By injecting malicious SQL queries via the ‘$id’ variable, an unauthenticated attacker can manipulate the database, potentially extracting sensitive information.

    Conceptual Example Code

    An example of how the vulnerability might be exploited could be a malicious HTTP request like below:

    GET /vulnerable_plugin/getSpace?id=1;DROP TABLE users; HTTP/1.1
    Host: target.example.com

    In this example, the attacker appends a ‘DROP TABLE’ SQL command to the ‘id’ parameter, which, if successful, would delete the ‘users’ table from the database. This is a simplified example and the actual attacks can be much more complex and damaging.

    Mitigation Guidance

    Users are advised to apply the latest vendor patch to fix the vulnerability. If a patch is not immediately available, the use of a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) could serve as temporary mitigation. These systems should be configured to detect and prevent SQL Injection attacks.

  • CVE-2025-53107: Command Injection Vulnerability in @cyanheads/git-mcp-server Potentially Leading to Remote Code Execution

    Overview

    This report details a critical vulnerability (CVE-2025-53107) in @cyanheads/git-mcp-server, an MCP server designed to interact with Git repositories. The vulnerability poses a significant risk to any organization using versions of the server prior to 2.1.5. If exploited, this vulnerability could lead to a total system compromise or data leakage.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-53107
    Severity: High (CVSS: 7.5)
    Attack Vector: Network
    Privileges Required: None
    User Interaction: Required
    Impact: Total system compromise or data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    @cyanheads/git-mcp-server | Prior to 2.1.5

    How the Exploit Works

    The vulnerability stems from an insecure use of input parameters within a call to child_process.exec in @cyanheads/git-mcp-server. The server constructs and executes shell commands using unvalidated user input directly within command-line strings. This allows for the injection of shell metacharacters (|, >, &&, etc.), enabling an attacker to inject arbitrary system commands. If successfully exploited, this vulnerability can lead to remote code execution under the server process’s privileges, which in turn can lead to a full system compromise or data leakage.

    Conceptual Example Code

    Below is a
    conceptual
    example of how the vulnerability might be exploited. Please note that this is illustrative and does not represent an actual exploit.

    # Connect to the server
    $ mcp-client connect target.example.com
    # Inject malicious command
    $ mcp-client exec "git log; rm -rf /*"

    In this example, an attacker connects to the target server using a vulnerable MCP client and then executes a command that first performs a harmless action (reading git logs) followed by a destructive action (deleting all files on the system).

    Mitigation Guidance

    Users of @cyanheads/git-mcp-server should immediately upgrade to version 2.1.5 or later, which contains a patch for this vulnerability. If upgrading is not immediately possible, temporary mitigation can be achieved by using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) to block or detect malicious commands.

  • CVE-2025-37098: Path Traversal Vulnerability in HPE Insight Remote Support

    Overview

    This report details a critical path traversal vulnerability (CVE-2025-37098) found in HPE Insight Remote Support (IRS) versions prior to v7.15.0.646. This vulnerability could potentially lead to system compromise or data leakage, posing a significant risk to any organization utilizing affected versions of HPE IRS. Immediate action is recommended to mitigate this risk.

    Vulnerability Summary

    CVE ID: CVE-2025-37098
    Severity: High (CVSS: 7.5)
    Attack Vector: Network
    Privileges Required: Low
    User Interaction: None
    Impact: Potential system compromise and data leakage

    Affected Products

    Product | Affected Versions

    HPE Insight Remote Support | Prior to v7.15.0.646

    How the Exploit Works

    A path traversal vulnerability exists in HPE Insight Remote Support which allows an attacker to access files or directories that are stored outside the web root folder. By manipulating variables that reference files with ‘dot-dot-slash (../)’ sequences and its variations, it may be possible to access arbitrary files and directories stored on the system, potentially leading to sensitive information disclosure or system compromise.

    Conceptual Example Code

    This conceptual example demonstrates how an attacker might exploit this vulnerability via an HTTP request to a vulnerable endpoint:

    GET /download?file=../../etc/passwd HTTP/1.1
    Host: target.example.com

    In this example, the attacker seeks to download the `/etc/passwd` file, which contains user password hashes on a Unix-like system. If successful, this could lead to unauthorized access and potential system compromise.

    Mitigation Guidance

    To mitigate this vulnerability, users are advised to apply the vendor-supplied patch as soon as possible. In the interim, a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or Intrusion Detection System (IDS) could be used to filter out malicious requests that attempt to exploit this vulnerability.

Ameeba Chat
Private by Nature

Amorphous. Adaptive. Resilient.

Ameeba Chat